Human Factors Ethics and Morality
Human Factors Ethics
and Morality
The purpose of this paper is to identify the general human
factors, ethical and moral issues related to unmanned aerial system (UAS) use
during warfare.
Some human factors required to successfully operate UAS
during war time operations are situational awareness, crew resource management,
crew training, scheduling, knowledge of systems, risk mitigation measures and
qualifications among many others (Hocraffer & Nang, 2017). The most important human factor during these
UAS operations is the actual decision to use lethal force. While many of the other mission functions are
autonomous, the decision regarding lethal force has human supervision (Johnstone,
2017).
Ethical considerations relate to how a set of rules or
governmental policy compares to the “right and wrong” of a moral code. In democratic societies, many concerns about
UAS during wars are muted by local political decisions (Kaag & Kreps,
2013). The issue of being “ethical” is
dependent on who one asks. The society receiving
the attack will find UAS use as being “unethical.” The offensive side will
define UAS use as the “end justifying the means” (Barela, 2015).
Moral considerations relate to an individual’s sense of a “right
and wrong.” These types of values are more likely to shape the local
environment relating directly to indigenous peoples (Barela, 2015). These values are generally more specific and
may have additional subcategories within gender, age, religions or other groups. The act of “killing” with UAS abroad may be acceptable
to a religious group within the United States, believing that national security
is an outstanding goal. Others may view any
“killing” as murder and not representing values which uphold the sanctity of
all life. These different citizens will
presumably vote for politicians and ballot measures representing their personal
morality, beginning a more complicated process of transforming personal
morality into nation-wide ethics.
There is a fine line between national security and using UAS
as killing tools. Any acts of lethal
force as sure to cause innocent deaths. As
technology has advanced, collateral damages to innocents has been reduced by more
selective targeting. This more precise targeting and use of force may be seen
and a more ethical and moral way to engage in war.
The introduction of autonomous action into the lethal force
decision making will change this conversation entirely. This specific topic is technologically possible,
and those discussions need to be engaged in now.
References
Barela, S. J. (2015). Legitimacy and
drones: investigating the legality, morality and efficacy of ucavs. Retrieved from https://ebookcentral.proquest.com
Johnstone, B. V. (2013). THE
MORALITY OF DRONES: Targeted killing. Compass, 47(3), 21- 26. Retrieved from http://search.proquest.com.ezproxy.libproxy.db.erau.edu
/docview/1466286538?accountid=27203
Hocraffer, A & Nang, C. (2017).
A Meta-Analysis of Human System Interfaces in Unmanned
Aerial
Vehicle (UAV) Swarm Management. Retrieved
from https://www-sciencedirect-com.ezproxy.libproxy.db.erau.edu/science/article/pii/S0003687016300989
Kaag, J., & Kreps, S. (2013,
Spring). Drones and democratic peace. The Brown Journal of World
Affairs, 19, 97-109. Retrieved from http://search.proquest.com.ezproxy.libproxy.
db.erau.edu/docview/1649691316?accountid=27203
Comments
Post a Comment